An Accra High Court has rejected the request made by South Dayi Member of Parliament, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, to compel President Akufo-Addo to receive the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill. Dafeamekpor's application, filed on March 25, sought a declaration that the President's refusal to receive the bill was unconstitutional under Article 106(1) and (7) of the Constitution. However, the Attorney-General's lawyers argued that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant Dafeamekpor's application, a stance upheld by the court, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Regarding the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill itself, which Parliament passed on February 28, it penalizes participation in LGBTQ sexual activities and promotion of LGBTQ rights, potentially leading to imprisonment. While some support the bill, others, including the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), have raised concerns about its compatibility with constitutional freedoms.
Ningo-Prampram MP Sam George asserts that the bill aligns with the constitution. However, the Finance Ministry has cautioned against the bill, warning of potential financial repercussions, including the loss of funding from the World Bank.
President Akufo-Addo has assured the international community of Ghana's commitment to human rights despite the bill's passage. He emphasized adherence to the rule of law and mentioned that the bill faces legal challenges in the Supreme Court.
Following this, the Office of the President requested Parliament not to transmit the bill to the President for assent. This decision was based on pending applications for an order of interlocutory injunction before the Supreme Court. The Attorney-General advised against any action on the bill until the legal matters are resolved.
